There is a moment, often unnoticed, when the arc of a retirement account begins to bend. Years may pass—years in which the diligent saver, believing the hard work done, watches the balance rise and fall with the tides of the market. Yet, beneath the surface, a quiet transformation is underway. The careful balance once chosen—stocks to bonds, risk to caution—slips, almost imperceptibly, out of alignment. Over time, as investments move in value and returns diverge, a portfolio that once matched its owner’s intentions begins to drift, inch by inch, toward a risk profile never intended.
This is where rebalancing enters the story—not as a fruitless pursuit of yesterday’s winners, but as a deliberate act. Rebalancing is not about chasing fleeting triumphs; it is the quiet, continual work that separates the accidental from the deliberate, the fortunate from the prepared. It is the act of returning, again and again, to first principles: What was the plan? What mix was chosen at the start? Over time, some investments grow faster than others, and the plan begins to drift.
Asset Allocation Sets the Risk Target
A 401(k) plan is an employer-sponsored retirement plan that gives employees a choice of investment options, often including mutual funds and target date funds (Investor.gov). Many employees who participate in 401(k) plans choose how to invest the money in their individual accounts among the plan’s available options (U.S. Department of Labor).
The starting point for those choices is asset allocation. Investor.gov explains that asset allocation involves dividing an investment portfolio among asset categories such as stocks, bonds, and cash, and that the best mix depends largely on the investor’s time horizon and risk tolerance (Investor.gov). For a 401(k) participant, that target allocation is the portfolio’s intended risk level.
For example, an investor with a longer time horizon may be more comfortable taking on a riskier or more volatile investment, while an investor with a shorter time horizon may take on less risk (Investor.gov). The key point is that the allocation should be chosen because it fits the investor’s plan, not because one asset class has recently performed well (Investor.gov).
Portfolio Drift Can Change the Risk Level
Even for the investor who never touches a thing—never sells, never buys—the portfolio itself will change, quietly and steadily. As investment values shift, the original allocation—so carefully chosen—begins to slip away. Without any action at all, the balance of the portfolio, and the risk it carries, shift simply by the relentless passage of time and the indifferent movement of the markets.
This drift can matter in both directions. If stocks perform strongly, the stock portion of a 401(k) may grow beyond the target, exposing the participant to more volatility than intended. If lower-risk holdings grow as a percentage of the account after a stock-market decline, the portfolio may become more conservative than intended, reducing future return potential. Fidelity notes that as higher-risk investments grow as a percentage of a portfolio, overall risk increases, and rebalancing can help bring risk exposure back into line (Fidelity).
Investor.gov gives a simple example: if stock investments were intended to represent 60% of a portfolio but rise to 80% after a stock-market increase, the investor would need to sell some stock investments or buy investments from an underweighted category to reestablish the original allocation mix (Investor.gov). The purpose is not to punish the asset class that did well. The purpose is to prevent the portfolio from becoming overly concentrated in a single category.
Rebalancing Is Not Performance Chasing
To rebalance is, at times, to act against instinct; it may mean trimming the investments that have soared, and adding to those that have lagged behind. There is a discipline here—a discipline that stands apart from the temptations of the moment. The purpose is not to chase the highest returns, but to keep the portfolio in line with the long-term intent, to keep risk in check, and to preserve the balance chosen at the outset.
Investor.gov makes a similar point, noting that savvy investors typically do not change their asset allocation based on the relative performance of asset categories, such as increasing the proportion of stocks when the stock market is hot; instead, they rebalance their portfolios at those times (Investor.gov). This distinction is especially important for 401(k) investors because retirement accounts are built for long-term goals, and reactive changes can move the account away from its intended risk profile.
Performance chasing is the question asked in the shadow of the present: What is hot now? How can I have more of it? Rebalancing, by contrast, asks the question that echoes from the beginning: What was the mix I chose for my goals? How far off am I? One is driven by the latest headline; the other by the enduring discipline of sticking to a plan.
Ways 401(k) Investors May Rebalance
Investor.gov describes three basic ways to rebalance a portfolio: sell investments from overweighted asset categories and buy underweighted categories, purchase new investments in underweighted categories, or adjust ongoing contributions so more money flows to underweighted categories until the portfolio is back in balance (Investor.gov). For 401(k) investors, the third method can be especially relevant because contributions are usually made through payroll deductions.
Fidelity also notes that new contributions can be used to rebalance by buying more of positions that have shrunk in percentage terms, which may restore target allocations without selling positions (Fidelity). In a tax-advantaged account such as a 401(k), Fidelity states that rebalancing does not generate tax consequences, although participants should still consider plan rules, investment restrictions, transaction policies, and any fees that may apply (Fidelity).
Some plans or investment options may also do part of the work automatically. FINRA notes that employer-sponsored retirement plans may offer automatic rebalancing or rebalancing assistance through the plan administrator (FINRA). Investor.gov explains that target date funds, which are common in retirement accounts, rebalance or change their investment mix over time, typically becoming more conservative as the target date approaches (Investor.gov Target Date Funds).
Automatic features can be helpful, but they do not remove the need to understand the overall allocation. Investor.govcautions that target date funds do not eliminate the need to decide whether the fund fits the investor’s financial situation, and says investors should examine their overall asset allocation and consider how the target date fund fits in (Investor.gov Target Date Funds).
Calendar, Threshold, and Hybrid Approaches
Rebalancing does not have to mean constant trading. Investor.gov explains that investors can rebalance on a calendar basis, such as every six or twelve months, or based on a threshold, such as when an asset class moves more than a certain percentage away from target (Investor.gov). Fidelity describes three approaches: calendar rebalancing, threshold rebalancing, and a hybrid approach that reviews the portfolio on a set schedule but rebalances only if the allocation has drifted by a predetermined amount (Fidelity).
The right approach depends on the investor, the plan, the investments, and the level of drift that would meaningfully change the portfolio’s risk. Vanguard gives an example of a 70% stock and 30% bond target that drifts to 76% stocks and 24% bonds, with the investor rebalancing when the allocation is off target by five percentage points or more (Vanguard). This type of rule can help make rebalancing more objective and less emotional.
Too much monitoring can create problems of its own. Fidelity cautions that watching investments too closely can tempt investors to trade too much or make reactive trading decisions, and says investors should seek a balanced approach that keeps allocations reasonably on course while considering taxes, fees, and mental bandwidth (Fidelity).
Rebalancing and Concentration Risk
Rebalancing can also help address concentration risk. FINRA defines concentration risk as the risk of amplified losses that can occur when a large portion of holdings is in a particular investment, asset class, or market segment relative to the overall portfolio (FINRA). FINRA recommends diversifying across and within major asset classes and rebalancing regularly so holdings remain aligned with investment objectives (FINRA).
This is useful for 401(k) participants who hold multiple funds, company stock, or several funds with overlapping holdings. FINRA recommends looking “under the hood” of each mutual fund or ETF to see whether funds hold similar companies or overlap with individual stocks or bonds, because simply holding only funds does not necessarily eliminate concentration risk (FINRA).
In a 401(k), concentration can arise gradually when asset performance causes one category, market segment, or investment to become a larger share of the account than intended (FINRA; Fidelity). A target date fund combined with separate stock or bond funds may also create more exposure to certain asset classes than intended, which is why Investor.gov says investors should examine their overall asset allocation and consider how a target date fund fits in (Investor.gov Target Date Funds). Periodic review helps participants determine whether the overall account still aligns with the target risk level.
A Discipline for Staying With the Plan
Rebalancing, in its essence, is the act of returning—again and again—to the plan. The investor begins with a target, checks to see whether the course has strayed, and, when it has, quietly corrects. It is in these steady, unglamorous acts of maintenance and resolve that the investor avoids the risk of becoming too aggressive after a rally, or too cautious after a downturn; it is in these moments that the original intent is preserved.
Rebalancing offers no promise of higher returns. That is not its purpose. Its value lies in preserving the balance first chosen, with risk and reward weighed in the beginning. For those saving for retirement across the years, this discipline makes the plan more comprehensible, more maintainable, and less vulnerable to the sudden, often emotional, turns of the market.
Source URLs
· Investor.gov, Beginners’ Guide to Asset Allocation, Diversification, and Rebalancing
· Investor.gov, Target Date Funds - Investor Bulletin
· U.S. Department of Labor, Investing and Diversification
· FINRA, Concentrate on Concentration Risk
· Vanguard, Rebalancing Your Portfolio
· Fidelity, Rebalancing Your Portfolio
This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as individualized investment, tax, legal, or retirement-plan advice. Rebalancing does not assure a profit, improve returns, or protect against loss in declining markets. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Rebalancing may involve transaction costs, fund restrictions, plan limitations, or tax consequences outside tax-advantaged accounts. 401(k) plan investment options, fees, automatic rebalancing features, and target date fund glide paths vary by plan and by fund. Investors should review plan documents, fund fact sheets, prospectuses, account statements, and their personal financial circumstances and consult their financial advisor, tax professional, or plan provider before making investment or rebalancing decisions.
Recent Articles
Let's talk about your future.
Connect with a local Duncan Williams Asset Management advisor
5350 Poplar Ave.
Suite 600
Memphis, TN 38119
